Whitepaper

Tools and Processes for Medical Device Cybersecurity | FDA Premarket Guidance Explained

Author:
No items found.
Reading time:
15
minutes
July 28, 2025
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an updated draft of the Premarket Cybersecurity Guidance in April 2022 which, when combined with existing finalized Postmarket Management of Cybersecurity in Medical Devices Guidance, specifies process and technical requirements to ensure medical devices are “secure by design” and that their security posture can be maintained over the lifetime of the device. In this paper we propose a hypothetical medical device vendor’s mature cybersecurity program that complies with FDA guidance, and we will analyze the processes and tools that aid in their success.

Executive summary

The FDA’s 2022 update to its Cybersecurity in Medical Devices: Quality System Considerations and Content of Premarket Submissions guidance signaled a clear shift: cybersecurity is no longer an afterthought, it’s a core quality requirement.This whitepaper explores the tools and processes necessary for medical device manufacturers (MDMs) to meet these expectations. It introduces the FDA’s secure product development framework (SPDF), maps guidance requirements to specific actions, and highlights how MedCrypt’s technology portfolio helps manufacturers address key areas like cryptography, vulnerability management, device monitoring, and postmarket security.

Why it matters

  • R&D leaders and engineering managers building connected medical devices
  • Quality and regulatory affairs professionals responsible for 510(k), PMA, or De Novo submissions
  • CISOs, product security leaders, and risk managers developing SPDF programs
  • Executives seeking to balance cost, compliance, and innovation in product design

Who should read

  • R&D leaders and engineering managers building connected medical devices
  • Quality and regulatory affairs professionals responsible for 510(k), PMA, or De Novo submissions
  • CISOs, product security leaders, and risk managers developing SPDF programs
  • Executives seeking to balance cost, compliance, and innovation in product design

Key insights

  • The FDA’s premarket guidance links cybersecurity directly to device safety and effectiveness.
  • Manufacturers must document processes and tools that address risk, resilience, and transparency.
  • Early investment in security architecture reduces postmarket cost and compliance burden.
  • MedCrypt’s solutions directly support SPDF implementation through cryptography, SBOM management, and device monitoring.
  • A build–buy–partner strategy accelerates compliance while maintaining design flexibility.

Table of contents

  1. Background: FDA’s Updated Cybersecurity Expectations
    1. Overview of the April 2022 premarket guidance draft
    2. Integration with the FDA’s postmarket cybersecurity framework
    3. Lifecycle-wide responsibility for “secure by design” devices
  2. Section I: Cybersecurity Integrates into the Device Lifecycle
    1. The FDA’s Secure Product Development Framework (SPDF)
    2. Key distinction between processes (quality management) and tools (technology enablers)
    3. Premarket cybersecurity requirements across device classes (510(k), PMA, IDE, HDE, etc.)
    4. Process & tool mapping across 14 FDA-specified control areas, including:
      1. Security risk management
      2. Threat modeling and supply chain risk
      3. Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
      4. Security architecture and testing
      5. Labeling and vulnerability disclosure plans
  3. Section II: MedCrypt Features and Functions
    1. How MedCrypt technology aligns with FDA guidance
    2. Cryptography and unique key generation per device
    3. Digital signatures for authenticated communications
    4. Device behavior monitoring and forensic logging
    5. Vulnerability Management as a Service (VMaaS) and SBOM traceability
  4. Section III: The Rationale for Implementing Security Early
    1. Cost and risk implications of retrofitting security postmarket
    2. Common medical device vulnerability types (user authentication & code defects)
    3. Build-buy-partner frameworks for cost-effective security implementation
    4. Examples of preventive strategies using cryptography, PKI, and static code analysis
  5. Section IV: Conclusion
    1. How proactive security mitigates regulatory and operational risk
    2. Industry call for shared platforms and communal knowledge
    3. The role of collaboration and commercial solutions in accelerating compliance

Related resources

play icon
Thank you! Let us know how you like the whitepaper or what we can do to improve it! We love your feedback!
Download whitepaper
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
This is some text inside of a div block.
This is some text inside of a div block.
Time:
This is some text inside of a div block.