Navigating the Labyrinth: Vulnerability Management in Medical Devices

Navigating the Labyrinth: Vulnerability Management in Medical Devices – It's Okay, You're Not Alone

‍

Hey Security Engineers, let's talk frankly. You're on the front lines, tasked with the Herculean effort of securing medical devices. You understand the stakes are higher here – it's not just protecting data; it's patient safety. And when it comes to vulnerability management in this highly regulated landscape, you're likely nodding along to the sentiment: it's complicated and it's on the verge of breaking.

The vulnerability disclosure ecosystem, as the diagram above illustrates, is a sprawling network. And over the past year we have seen two instances where funding changes led to a severe compromise of the system, and most recently almost total collapse of MITRE’s CVE program.

The Not-So-Perfect World of Vulnerability Data

We need to bear in mind that today’s system was architected when we were dealing with a few 100 new vulnerabilities a year and was supported by a few pertinent stakeholders. Today we have several 10,000 new vulnerabilities that feed into a complex ecosystem (see image) of manual and automated risk and vulnerability management systems and the overall process is supported by hundreds of vested parties.

The average journey for a vulnerability is that it’s discovered, potentially disclosed through various channels, maybe makes its way to MITRE's CVE list, and then perhaps (and this is a big "perhaps") gets analyzed and added to the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) by NIST. Security scanners chime in, and eventually, if deemed critical, CISA might issue a Known Exploited Vulnerability (KEV) entry.

Sounds straightforward? Not quite.

Let's be honest, relying solely on the NVD can feel like navigating a maze blindfolded. You're dealing with:

Inconsistent Data: The level of detail and the speed at which vulnerabilities are analyzed and enriched in the NVD can vary significantly and has significantly slowed over the past year. This means crucial context might be missing or delayed, leaving you scrambling for information.
The "Maybe" Factor: Not every disclosed vulnerability makes it into the NVD. Some might be specific to certain configurations or might be deemed less severe, potentially slipping through the cracks of your traditional scanning tools that heavily rely on this database.
Noise Over Signal: The sheer volume of vulnerabilities reported daily can be overwhelming. Sifting through the noise to identify those truly relevant to your specific medical devices is a time-consuming and resource-intensive task.
Delayed Information: The lag between a vulnerability disclosure and its appearance with comprehensive analysis in the NVD can leave your devices exposed during a critical window.
Enrichment Shortcomings: Fun fact - currently the shortfall of vulnerabilities that have not gone through the NVD enrichment process stands at about 25,000. While the NVD is trying to change enrichment processes so CNAs start enriching their own CVEs, there is a growing population of CVEs simply not being processed due to NVD’s operational constraints.

But imperfect as it is, the CVE/NVD system is the only one we have today and everybody, from international governments to secondary commercial databases, rely on it to a degree. In other words, NVD is the root but also single point of failure of all global vulnerability management efforts and its failure would lead to a collapse of cyber risk management as we know it - not a good prospect in a time of increasing cyber threats and geopolitical conflict. Although efforts are under way to address this systemic risk and stand up additional and improved systems, these are still years out.

The Medical Device Difference

On top of these inherent challenges, medical devices introduce their own layer of intricacy:

Long Lifecycles: Unlike typical IT assets, medical devices often have extended lifespans. This means you're managing vulnerabilities discovered years after the device was designed and deployed, potentially involving outdated software and hardware.
Interconnectedness: Modern medical devices are increasingly interconnected, creating a broader attack surface and making it crucial to understand the potential impact of a vulnerability across an entire system of systems.
Patient Safety Imperative: The consequences of a security breach in a medical device can be life-threatening, demanding a more rigorous and proactive approach to vulnerability management than in other industries.
Regulatory Scrutiny: You're operating under strict regulatory frameworks (like the FDA in the US), which mandate robust cybersecurity practices, including comprehensive vulnerability management.
Proactive vs. Reactive: In the traditional IT space the typical approach to vulnerability management is reactive: identify - assess - patch. Although not perfect and we have seen examples of astounding failures, it is the generally accepted approach and disciplined organizations can make it work. However, with medical devices, the patch development, release, and deployment cycle is much longer (months if not years). Therefore, every additional delay or complication adds to the systemic challenges we are facing.

Finding Your Way Through the Fog: There's a Better Path

So, you're facing a complex ecosystem with imperfect data and high stakes. It's understandable if it feels overwhelming. But here's the good news: you don't have to navigate this labyrinth alone.

Imagine a solution that understands the unique challenges of medical device vulnerability management. A solution that goes beyond simply pulling data from the NVD and provides you with the context, prioritization, and actionable insights you need to secure your devices effectively.

Enter Medcrypt's Helm.

Helm is specifically designed with medical device manufacturers in mind. We understand the nuances of your environment, the criticality of patient safety, and the demands of regulatory compliance. While we acknowledge the imperfections in the broader vulnerability landscape, Helm empowers you to:

Eliminate False Matches: Helm has low false negative and false positive rates to differentiate the signal from the noise.
Gain Enhanced Visibility: Helm integrates with various sources, providing a more comprehensive view of potential vulnerabilities relevant to your specific device configurations, going beyond the limitations of the NVD alone.
Prioritize with Context: We help you cut through the noise by providing medical device-specific context, allowing you to focus on the vulnerabilities that truly pose the greatest risk to your devices and patients.
Streamline Remediation: Helm facilitates a more efficient vulnerability management workflow, helping you track, manage, and remediate vulnerabilities effectively, even across long device lifecycles.
Meet Regulatory Requirements: By providing a robust and well-documented vulnerability management process, Helm helps you meet the stringent cybersecurity requirements of regulatory bodies.
Improving Data Sources: In order to deal with and improve on the shortcomings of the NVD, Helm gathers data from many sources (security advisories, package managers, OSV.dev, etc.) and uses that along with human analysis and automated tools (i.e. LLMs) to enrich the NVDs CPEs/CVEs.

The vulnerability management ecosystem isn't perfect, and relying solely on any single database has its limitations. But with focused effort and the right tools – like Medcrypt's Helm – medical device manufacturers can significantly improve their security posture, navigate the complexities, and ultimately ensure the safety and security of their patients.

Ready to take control of your medical device vulnerability management journey? Let's explore how Helm can help.

‍

Additional reading that could be useful:

‍